Core i5-10400F vs i5-11400
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a0671
Core
Comet Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
86.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
489.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
31.23k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
25.88k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
10.83k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
18.17k (x1.4)
TOTAL
68.14k
86.11k (x1.26)
Multithread
i5-10400F
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
213.85k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
195.51k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
72.06k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
7.89k (x1.04)
TOTAL
369.97k
489.31k (x1.32)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
3290 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
3008 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
7528 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
7098 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
5881 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
2461 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
4130 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
19570 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4