Core i5-10400 vs i5-13400
Description
The i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 367.7 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 367.7 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
b06f2
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
69.31k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
367.65k points
497.83k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
27.46k
47.01k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
24.28k
26.73k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
14.28k (x2.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.92k
12.1k (x1.01)
TOTAL
69.31k
100.11k (x1.44)
Multithread
i5-10400
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
165.5k
228.2k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
156.32k
160.28k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.88k
71.12k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.96k
38.23k (x6.42)
TOTAL
367.65k
497.83k (x1.35)
Performance/W
i5-10400
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
2546 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2405 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
614 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
5656 points/W
7659 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
6386 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1314 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2772 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
16118 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4