Core i5-10400 vs i3-13100F
Description
The i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 367.7 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 367.7 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
b06f5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
69.31k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
367.65k points
390.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
27.46k
47.14k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
24.28k
25.77k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
13.25k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.92k
14.77k (x1.24)
TOTAL
69.31k
100.94k (x1.46)
Multithread
i5-10400
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
165.5k
168.51k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
156.32k
142.8k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.88k
63.57k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.96k
15.34k (x2.58)
TOTAL
367.65k
390.23k (x1.06)
Performance/W
i5-10400
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
2546 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2405 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
614 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
5656 points/W
6728 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
6386 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1314 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2772 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
16118 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4