| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400 vs i5-12400F


Description
The i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 367.7 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
90675
Core
Comet Lake-S
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
69.31k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
367.65k points
399.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
27.46k
33.85k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
24.28k
20.33k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
10.51k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.92k
11.77k (x0.99)
TOTAL
69.31k
76.46k (x1.1)

Multithread

i5-10400

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
165.5k
174.21k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
156.32k
141.31k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.88k
64.86k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.96k
19.01k (x3.19)
TOTAL
367.65k
399.39k (x1.09)

Performance/W
i5-10400
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2546 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2405 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
614 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
5656 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6386 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1314 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2772 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
16118 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4