Core i5-1038NG7 vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
50654
Core
Ice Lake-U
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1344
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
11264 kB
Date
May 2020
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
65.35k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
281.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1038NG7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
23.2k
18.78k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
21.2k
16.25k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
3.99k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.54k
6.8k (x0.59)
TOTAL
65.35k
45.82k (x0.7)
Multithread
i5-1038NG7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
94.68k
133.55k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
103.38k
108.43k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.79k
30.02k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.33k
9.48k (x1.02)
TOTAL
243.18k
281.48k (x1.16)
Performance/W
i5-1038NG7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3381 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3692 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1278 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
8685 points/W
3311 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1038NG7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
6106 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5580 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2473 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3037 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
17197 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4