Core i5-1038NG7 vs i7-5960X
Description
The i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-5960X is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i7-5960X gets 294.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5960X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i7-5960X gets 294.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5960X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
306f2
Core
Ice Lake-U
Haswell-E
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1344
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
20480 kB
Date
May 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
65.35k points
13.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
294.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1038NG7
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
23.2k
6.6k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
21.2k
3.8k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
1.41k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.54k
1.34k (x0.12)
TOTAL
65.35k
13.16k (x0.2)
Multithread
i5-1038NG7
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
94.68k
146.65k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
103.38k
100.72k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.79k
34.09k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.33k
12.83k (x1.38)
TOTAL
243.18k
294.29k (x1.21)
Performance/W
i5-1038NG7
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
3381 points/W
1047 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3692 points/W
719 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1278 points/W
243 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
8685 points/W
2102 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1038NG7
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
6106 points/GHz
1887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5580 points/GHz
1086 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2473 points/GHz
403 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3037 points/GHz
384 points/GHz
TOTAL
17197 points/GHz
3759 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4