| | | | | | |

Core i5-1038NG7 vs i5-8365U


Description
The i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-8365U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i5-8365U gets 197.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1038NG7 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-8365U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
806ec
Core
Ice Lake-U
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1344
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
65.35k points
59.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
197.46k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1038NG7
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.2k
24.37k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
21.2k
22.68k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
4.98k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.54k
7.7k (x0.67)
TOTAL
65.35k
59.73k (x0.91)

Multithread

i5-1038NG7

i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
94.68k
89.45k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
103.38k
85.57k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.79k
19.02k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.33k
3.41k (x0.37)
TOTAL
243.18k
197.46k (x0.81)

Performance/W
i5-1038NG7
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
3381 points/W
5964 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3692 points/W
5705 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1278 points/W
1268 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
227 points/W
TOTAL
8685 points/W
13164 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1038NG7
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
6106 points/GHz
5944 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5580 points/GHz
5531 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2473 points/GHz
1214 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3037 points/GHz
1879 points/GHz
TOTAL
17197 points/GHz
14568 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4