Core i5-1038NG7 vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
Description
The i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 5900HX is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HX is 1.7 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HX is 1.7 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
a50f00
Core
Ice Lake-U
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1344
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
May 2020
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
65.35k points
85.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
421.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1038NG7
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
23.2k
23.29k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
21.2k
25.89k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
11.75k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.54k
24.83k (x2.15)
TOTAL
65.35k
85.76k (x1.31)
Multithread
i5-1038NG7
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
94.68k
138.16k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
103.38k
192.12k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.79k
80.84k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.33k
9.93k (x1.06)
TOTAL
243.18k
421.05k (x1.73)
Performance/W
i5-1038NG7
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3381 points/W
3070 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3692 points/W
4269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1278 points/W
1796 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
221 points/W
TOTAL
8685 points/W
9357 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1038NG7
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6106 points/GHz
5064 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5580 points/GHz
5628 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2473 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3037 points/GHz
5398 points/GHz
TOTAL
17197 points/GHz
18644 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4