| | | | | | |

Core i5-1038NG7 vs Ryzen 7 5700X


Description
The i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 5700X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the 5700X gets 517.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X is 2.1 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
a20f12
Core
Ice Lake-U
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1344
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
32768 kB
Date
May 2020
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
65.35k points
85.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
517.51k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1038NG7
5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
23.2k
23.24k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
21.2k
25.25k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
11.66k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.54k
25.49k (x2.21)
TOTAL
65.35k
85.64k (x1.31)

Multithread

i5-1038NG7

5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
94.68k
174.56k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
103.38k
228.94k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.79k
102.32k (x2.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.33k
11.69k (x1.25)
TOTAL
243.18k
517.51k (x2.13)

Performance/W
i5-1038NG7
5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3381 points/W
2685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3692 points/W
3522 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1278 points/W
1574 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
180 points/W
TOTAL
8685 points/W
7962 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1038NG7
5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6106 points/GHz
5052 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5580 points/GHz
5490 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2473 points/GHz
2535 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3037 points/GHz
5540 points/GHz
TOTAL
17197 points/GHz
18617 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4