| | | | | | |

Core i5-1038NG7 vs i3-1215U


Description
The i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1038NG7 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906a4
Core
Ice Lake-U
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1344
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/8
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
10240 kB
Date
May 2020
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
65.35k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
185.6k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1038NG7
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.2k
37.56k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
21.2k
21.13k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
11.35k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.54k
10.31k (x0.89)
TOTAL
65.35k
80.34k (x1.23)

Multithread

i5-1038NG7

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
94.68k
73.97k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
103.38k
72.37k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.79k
29.61k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.33k
9.65k (x1.03)
TOTAL
243.18k
185.6k (x0.76)

Performance/W
i5-1038NG7
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
3381 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3692 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1278 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
8685 points/W
12374 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1038NG7
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
6106 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5580 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2473 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3037 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
17197 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4