| | | | | | |

Core i5-1038NG7 vs i9-11900KB


Description
The i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 2.2 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
806d1
Core
Ice Lake-U
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1344
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
24576 kB
Date
May 2020
July 2021
Mean monothread perf.
65.35k points
63.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
537.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1038NG7
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
23.2k
24.09k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
21.2k
19.54k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
8.48k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.54k
11.68k (x1.01)
TOTAL
65.35k
63.79k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-1038NG7

i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
94.68k
220.79k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
103.38k
225.98k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.79k
79.1k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.33k
11.32k (x1.21)
TOTAL
243.18k
537.18k (x2.21)

Performance/W
i5-1038NG7
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
3381 points/W
3397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3692 points/W
3477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1278 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
8685 points/W
8264 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1038NG7
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
6106 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5580 points/GHz
3988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2473 points/GHz
1730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3037 points/GHz
2384 points/GHz
TOTAL
17197 points/GHz
13018 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4