Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon X5675
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 87.5 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 87.5 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
206c2
Core
Ice Lake-U
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
6 /12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2019
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
124.92k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
8.77k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
5.82k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
3.47k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
2.98k (x0.53)
TOTAL
28.56k
21.04k (x0.74)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
53.23k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
39.35k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
27.05k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
5.28k (x0.76)
TOTAL
87.45k
124.92k (x1.43)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
1685 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2499 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1185 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
461 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5830 points/W
1315 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
1910 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1424 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
7718 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4