| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E5506


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 87.5 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5506 is 1 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
106a5
Core
Ice Lake-U
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /4
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
9.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
90.45k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
1.21k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
2.75k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
1.94k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
0.78k (x0.07)
TOTAL
38.92k
6.68k (x0.17)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
12.25k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
25.55k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
17.1k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
5.01k (x0.74)
TOTAL
65.01k
59.9k (x0.92)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
4.48k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
2.99k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
1.81k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
0.69k (x0.12)
TOTAL
28.56k
9.97k (x0.35)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
41k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
28.17k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
17.4k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
3.88k (x0.56)
TOTAL
87.45k
90.45k (x1.03)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1685 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2499 points/W
352 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1185 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
461 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
5830 points/W
1131 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1910 points/GHz
2099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1424 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
7718 points/GHz
4675 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4