Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 3.2 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 3.2 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
306f2
Core
Ice Lake-U
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
30720 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
452.9k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
3.52k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
8.68k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
2.83k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
3.13k (x0.3)
TOTAL
38.92k
18.17k (x0.47)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
32.7k (x3.61)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
105.18k (x3.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
35.18k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
9.54k (x1.42)
TOTAL
65.01k
182.59k (x2.81)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
11.08k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
9.57k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
3.18k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
3.28k (x0.58)
TOTAL
28.56k
27.11k (x0.95)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
139.07k (x5.5)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
133.47k (x3.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
46.6k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
6.65k (x0.96)
TOTAL
87.45k
325.78k (x3.73)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
11.18k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
10.06k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
3.21k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
3.12k (x0.29)
TOTAL
54.03k
27.57k (x0.51)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
140.98k (x2.54)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
145.37k (x2.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
45.62k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
6.75k (x1.01)
TOTAL
143.94k
338.73k (x2.35)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
18.62k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
10.49k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
4.04k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
3.26k (x0.3)
TOTAL
65.64k
36.41k (x0.55)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
236.25k (x4.04)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
151.05k (x2.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
58.9k (x2.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
6.7k (x0.98)
TOTAL
142.69k
452.9k (x3.17)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
3774 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4