Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E3-1270 v2
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the E3-1270 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 143.9 k points while the E3-1270 v2 gets 139.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 143.9 k points while the E3-1270 v2 gets 139.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
306a9
Core
Ice Lake-U
Ivy Bridge-H2
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /8
TDP
15 W
69 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
36.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
139.38k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
13.16k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
12.51k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
5k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
5.62k (x0.53)
TOTAL
54.03k
36.29k (x0.67)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
51.89k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
57.35k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
23.74k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
6.4k (x0.96)
TOTAL
143.94k
139.38k (x0.97)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
752 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3934 points/W
831 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1522 points/W
344 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
9596 points/W
2020 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3757 points/GHz
3374 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5440 points/GHz
3207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2543 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2862 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
14601 points/GHz
9304 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4