| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs Core 2 Quad Q8400


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the Q8400 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 87.5 k points while the Q8400 gets 51.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.7 times faster than the Q8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
1067a
Core
Ice Lake-U
Yorkfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.666 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.666 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
128+128 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2009
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
14.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
51.92k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
2.44k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
6.24k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
2.62k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
1.43k (x0.14)
TOTAL
38.92k
12.73k (x0.33)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
9.71k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
24.81k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
10.51k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
2.03k (x0.3)
TOTAL
65.01k
47.05k (x0.72)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
3.08k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
6.8k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
2.73k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
1.42k (x0.25)
TOTAL
28.56k
14.04k (x0.49)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
12.25k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
26.84k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
10.82k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
2.02k (x0.29)
TOTAL
87.45k
51.92k (x0.59)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1685 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2499 points/W
283 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1185 points/W
114 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
461 points/W
21 points/W
TOTAL
5830 points/W
547 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1910 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1424 points/GHz
1025 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
532 points/GHz
TOTAL
7718 points/GHz
5265 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4