| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i7-8750H


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i7-8750H gets 231.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 1.6 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906ea
Core
Ice Lake-U
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
9216 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
53.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
231.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
3.01k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
11.68k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
3.78k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
5.64k (x0.54)
TOTAL
38.92k
24.12k (x0.62)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
7.4k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
29.99k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
9.66k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
5.12k (x0.76)
TOTAL
65.01k
52.18k (x0.8)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
15.14k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
22.8k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
5.5k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
10.97k (x1.04)
TOTAL
54.03k
54.41k (x1.01)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
82.81k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
118.58k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
25.08k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
4.86k (x0.73)
TOTAL
143.94k
231.34k (x1.61)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
22.36k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
19.33k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
4.4k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
7.32k (x0.68)
TOTAL
65.64k
53.41k (x0.81)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
103.82k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
100.47k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
23.81k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
3.8k (x0.56)
TOTAL
142.69k
231.9k (x1.63)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
2307 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
2233 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
529 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
5153 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
5454 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
4714 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1073 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
1786 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
13027 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4