Core i5-1035G4 vs i7-7660U
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-7660U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i7-7660U gets 132.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-7660U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i7-7660U gets 132.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-7660U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
806e9
Core
Ice Lake-U
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
57.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
132.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
22.46k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
19.29k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
4.77k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
10.94k (x1.01)
TOTAL
65.64k
57.46k (x0.88)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
56.67k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
46.95k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
12.36k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
16.84k (x2.47)
TOTAL
142.69k
132.81k (x0.93)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
3778 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
3130 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
824 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
1122 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
8854 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
5614 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
4823 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1193 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
2735 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
14365 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4