| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i5-460 M


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-460 M is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 87.5 k points while the i5-460 M gets 33.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 2.6 times faster than the i5-460 M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
20655
Core
Ice Lake-U
Arrandale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.533 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
PGA 988A
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2010
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
16.32k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
33.69k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-460 M
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
6.85k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
4.64k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
2.72k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
2.1k (x0.37)
TOTAL
28.56k
16.32k (x0.57)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i5-460 M
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
13.71k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
10.68k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
6.65k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
2.65k (x0.38)
TOTAL
87.45k
33.69k (x0.39)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i5-460 M
Test#1 (Integers)
1685 points/W
392 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2499 points/W
305 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1185 points/W
190 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
461 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
5830 points/W
962 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i5-460 M
Test#1 (Integers)
1910 points/GHz
2447 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
1658 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1424 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
751 points/GHz
TOTAL
7718 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4