Core i5-1035G4 vs i5-10210U
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
806ec
Core
Ice Lake-U
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
145.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
23.11k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
20.58k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
4.73k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
7.43k (x0.69)
TOTAL
65.64k
55.86k (x0.85)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
65.84k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
60.77k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
14.45k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
4.44k (x0.65)
TOTAL
142.69k
145.51k (x1.02)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
9701 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4