Core i5-1035G4 vs Celeron N5105
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 87.5 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.4 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 87.5 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.4 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
906c0
Core
Ice Lake-U
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
9.83k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
9.74k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
3.65k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
3.88k (x0.69)
TOTAL
28.56k
27.1k (x0.95)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
25.04k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
24.7k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
9.29k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
5.06k (x0.73)
TOTAL
87.45k
64.09k (x0.73)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
1685 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2499 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1185 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
461 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
5830 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
1910 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1424 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
7718 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4