Core i5-1035G4 vs Ryzen 9 3900X
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 3900X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 5.3 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 5.3 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
870f10
Core
Ice Lake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
August 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
72.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
756.3k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
4.46k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
18.46k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
8.05k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
23.71k (x2.25)
TOTAL
38.92k
54.68k (x1.4)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
52.65k (x5.82)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
265.41k (x7.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
140.78k (x9.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
46.91k (x6.96)
TOTAL
65.01k
505.76k (x7.78)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
17.35k (x2.46)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
25.87k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
8.72k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
27.86k (x4.92)
TOTAL
28.56k
79.8k (x2.79)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
201.57k (x7.97)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
284.41k (x7.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
145.16k (x8.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
100.56k (x14.54)
TOTAL
87.45k
731.7k (x8.37)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
16.95k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
25.37k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
9.23k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
24.83k (x2.35)
TOTAL
54.03k
76.38k (x1.41)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
196.31k (x3.54)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
290.5k (x4.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
143.95k (x6.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
64.92k (x9.69)
TOTAL
143.94k
695.69k (x4.83)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
16.73k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
24.74k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
8.82k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
22.22k (x2.06)
TOTAL
65.64k
72.51k (x1.1)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
248.24k (x4.25)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
309.66k (x5.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
140.01k (x6.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
58.39k (x8.57)
TOTAL
142.69k
756.3k (x5.3)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
2364 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
2949 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
556 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
7203 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5377 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
4831 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
15763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4