Core i5-1035G4 vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
810f81
Core
Ice Lake-U
Picasso
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
3.89k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
17.94k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
5.34k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
6.62k (x0.63)
TOTAL
38.92k
33.79k (x0.87)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
15.07k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
66.84k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
19.56k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
6.54k (x0.97)
TOTAL
65.01k
108.01k (x1.66)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
14.3k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
21.69k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
5.42k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
6.6k (x1.17)
TOTAL
28.56k
48k (x1.68)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
55.45k (x2.19)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
83.13k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
20.76k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
6.58k (x0.95)
TOTAL
87.45k
165.91k (x1.9)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
13.05k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
22.88k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
5.39k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
7.31k (x0.69)
TOTAL
54.03k
48.63k (x0.9)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
51.73k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
87.74k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
20.74k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
6.57k (x0.98)
TOTAL
143.94k
166.79k (x1.16)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
14.48k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
23.84k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
5.43k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
5.46k (x0.51)
TOTAL
65.64k
49.21k (x0.75)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
54.39k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
88.77k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
20.04k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
5.48k (x0.8)
TOTAL
142.69k
168.69k (x1.18)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4