Core i5-1035G4 vs Athlon 3000G
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.5 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.5 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
810f81
Core
Ice Lake-U
Picasso
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
95.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
13.02k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
20.56k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
4.81k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
5.43k (x0.5)
TOTAL
65.64k
43.82k (x0.67)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
27.29k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
49.37k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
13.57k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
5.61k (x0.82)
TOTAL
142.69k
95.84k (x0.67)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
2738 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4