| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i5-12500H


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.6 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906a3
Core
Ice Lake-U
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
18432 kB
Date
August 2019
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
225.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
6.93k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
18.76k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
9.46k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
8.17k (x0.77)
TOTAL
38.92k
43.33k (x1.11)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
18.04k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
66.78k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
37.55k (x2.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
6.08k (x0.9)
TOTAL
65.01k
128.45k (x1.98)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
21.93k (x3.1)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
18.79k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
10.5k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
8.11k (x1.43)
TOTAL
28.56k
59.33k (x2.08)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
61.07k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
86.08k (x2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
41.08k (x2.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
6.02k (x0.87)
TOTAL
87.45k
194.25k (x2.22)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
21.11k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
19.61k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
9.53k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
7.72k (x0.73)
TOTAL
54.03k
57.97k (x1.07)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
61.44k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
93.66k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
40.09k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
6.01k (x0.9)
TOTAL
143.94k
201.2k (x1.4)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
22.61k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
17.73k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
9.63k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
8.4k (x0.78)
TOTAL
65.64k
58.37k (x0.89)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
85.49k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
94.93k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
39.15k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
6.08k (x0.89)
TOTAL
142.69k
225.65k (x1.58)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
870 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
5014 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
5025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
2139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
1867 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
12971 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4