| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs Xeon W-2223


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
50657
Core
Ice Lake-U
Glacier Falls
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8448 kB
Date
August 2019
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
243.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G1
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
3.97k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
14.98k
14.5k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
4.78k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
8.19k (x0.95)
TOTAL
37.15k
31.45k (x0.85)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
14.61k
15.56k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
54.9k
59.23k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.58k
22.87k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
6.85k (x1.36)
TOTAL
102.13k
104.51k (x1.02)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
25.09k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
20.76k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
5.07k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
8.76k (x1.06)
TOTAL
55.37k
59.68k (x1.08)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
111.43k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
100.2k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
24.67k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
6.89k (x1.24)
TOTAL
171.65k
243.18k (x1.42)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
2027 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4