| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs Xeon X5670


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 141.9 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.2 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
206c2
Core
Ice Lake-U
Westmere-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
6 /6
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
115.4k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
8.35k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
18.55k
5.58k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
3.32k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
3k (x0.31)
TOTAL
50.91k
20.26k (x0.4)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
50.06k
49.72k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
66.1k
35.19k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.24k
21.88k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
8.6k (x1.56)
TOTAL
141.91k
115.4k (x0.81)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
3337 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4407 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1349 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
368 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
9461 points/W
1215 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
3580 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5153 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2759 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2650 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
14142 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4