| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs Xeon E5-1660 v4


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the E5-1660 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 164.9 k points while the E5-1660 v4 gets 320.5 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
406f1
Core
Ice Lake-U
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
20480 kB
Date
August 2019
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
37.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
320.49k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
12.41k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
19.53k
17.23k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.37k
4.89k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.23k
3.07k (x0.33)
TOTAL
51.7k
37.6k (x0.73)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
56.25k
102.11k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
73.73k
156.5k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.56k
42.08k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.39k
19.8k (x3.67)
TOTAL
164.94k
320.49k (x1.94)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3750 points/W
729 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4916 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1971 points/W
301 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
360 points/W
141 points/W
TOTAL
10996 points/W
2289 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3772 points/GHz
3266 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5424 points/GHz
4534 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2603 points/GHz
1286 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2563 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
TOTAL
14362 points/GHz
9895 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4