Core i5-1035G1 vs m3-7Y30
Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 3.3 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 3.3 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
806e9
Core
Ice Lake-U
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
1 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
52.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
10.02k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
9.22k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
2.04k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
4.31k (x0.52)
TOTAL
55.37k
25.6k (x0.46)
Multithread
i5-1035G1
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
21.75k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
20.51k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
4.97k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
5.56k (x1.01)
TOTAL
171.65k
52.78k (x0.31)
Performance/W
i5-1035G1
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
11730 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4