| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs i9-9900K


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 3.1 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906ed
Core
Ice Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2019
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
529.32k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
5k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
14.98k
20.22k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
6.54k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
13.78k (x1.6)
TOTAL
37.15k
45.53k (x1.23)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.61k
36.39k (x2.49)
Test#2 (FP)
54.9k
166.55k (x3.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.58k
54.92k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
8.96k (x1.78)
TOTAL
102.13k
266.82k (x2.61)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
18.03k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
18.55k
25.98k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
6.86k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
14.5k (x1.52)
TOTAL
50.91k
65.37k (x1.28)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
50.06k
131.34k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
66.1k
204.76k (x3.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.24k
55.74k (x2.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
8.99k (x1.63)
TOTAL
141.91k
400.83k (x2.82)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
17.98k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
19.53k
27.04k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.37k
6.63k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.23k
13.6k (x1.47)
TOTAL
51.7k
65.24k (x1.26)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
56.25k
130.88k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
73.73k
208.5k (x2.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.56k
54.12k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.39k
8.91k (x1.65)
TOTAL
164.94k
402.41k (x2.44)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
32.08k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
28.17k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
6.68k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
14.98k (x1.82)
TOTAL
55.37k
81.91k (x1.48)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
242.98k (x3.33)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
220.16k (x3.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
53.97k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
12.22k (x2.21)
TOTAL
171.65k
529.32k (x3.08)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
2558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
2317 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
568 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
5572 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
6417 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5634 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
16382 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4