| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs i9-10900KF


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 4.8 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
a0655
Core
Ice Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/20
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
20480 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
825.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
35.87k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
31.43k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
7.34k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
15.73k (x1.91)
TOTAL
55.37k
90.37k (x1.63)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
377.56k (x5.17)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
347.59k (x5.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
88.08k (x3.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
12.24k (x2.21)
TOTAL
171.65k
825.47k (x4.81)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
6604 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4