Core i5-1035G1 vs Celeron N4100
Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 141.9 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 3.5 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 141.9 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 3.5 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
706a1
Core
Ice Lake-U
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
1 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA1090
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
kB
Date
August 2019
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
17.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
40.57k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
4.72k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
18.55k
6.99k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
2.69k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
2.81k (x0.29)
TOTAL
50.91k
17.21k (x0.34)
Multithread
i5-1035G1
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
50.06k
12.54k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
66.1k
17.99k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.24k
6.71k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
3.33k (x0.6)
TOTAL
141.91k
40.57k (x0.29)
Performance/W
i5-1035G1
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
3337 points/W
2090 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4407 points/W
2999 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1349 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
368 points/W
555 points/W
TOTAL
9461 points/W
6762 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
3580 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5153 points/GHz
2914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2759 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2650 points/GHz
1171 points/GHz
TOTAL
14142 points/GHz
7172 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4