| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs Celeron G3900TE


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 141.9 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 2.9 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
506e3
Core
Ice Lake-U
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2019
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
49.34k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G1
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
2.36k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
14.98k
9.79k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
3.08k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
3.36k (x0.39)
TOTAL
37.15k
18.59k (x0.5)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
14.61k
4.45k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
54.9k
18.16k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.58k
5.48k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
3.5k (x0.69)
TOTAL
102.13k
31.59k (x0.31)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
8.56k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
18.55k
12.25k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
3.17k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
3.35k (x0.35)
TOTAL
50.91k
27.33k (x0.54)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
50.06k
16.42k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
66.1k
23.61k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.24k
5.75k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
3.55k (x0.64)
TOTAL
141.91k
49.34k (x0.35)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
3337 points/W
469 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4407 points/W
675 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1349 points/W
164 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
368 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
9461 points/W
1410 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
3580 points/GHz
3724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5153 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2759 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2650 points/GHz
1455 points/GHz
TOTAL
14142 points/GHz
11885 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4