| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs Celeron G1610T


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 141.9 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 3.7 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
306a9
Core
Ice Lake-U
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2019
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
38.59k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G1
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
2.34k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
14.98k
6.54k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
3k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
2.74k (x0.32)
TOTAL
37.15k
14.62k (x0.39)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.61k
4.67k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
54.9k
12.66k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.58k
5.95k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
2.53k (x0.5)
TOTAL
102.13k
25.8k (x0.25)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
7.87k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
18.55k
7.14k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
3.04k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
2.79k (x0.29)
TOTAL
50.91k
20.84k (x0.41)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
50.06k
15.12k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
66.1k
14.05k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.24k
5.94k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
3.48k (x0.63)
TOTAL
141.91k
38.59k (x0.27)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3337 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4407 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1349 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
368 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
9461 points/W
1103 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3580 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5153 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2759 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2650 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
14142 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4