Core i5-1035G1 vs Ryzen 9 5900X
Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 4.9 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 4.9 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
a20f10
Core
Ice Lake-U
Vermeer
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
August 2019
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
89.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
840.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
24.34k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
26.8k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
12.12k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
26.55k (x3.22)
TOTAL
55.37k
89.82k (x1.62)
Multithread
i5-1035G1
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
263.12k (x3.6)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
353.9k (x5.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
159.07k (x6.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
64.01k (x11.56)
TOTAL
171.65k
840.11k (x4.89)
Performance/W
i5-1035G1
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
2506 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
3371 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
1515 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
610 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
8001 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
5071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
5530 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
18712 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4