Core i5-1035G1 vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2.1 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2.1 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
860f01
Core
Ice Lake-U
Renoir
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
14.87k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
21.53k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
8.39k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
8.21k (x1)
TOTAL
55.37k
53k (x0.96)
Multithread
i5-1035G1
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
124.63k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
158.62k (x2.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
69.79k (x2.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
7.53k (x1.36)
TOTAL
171.65k
360.57k (x2.1)
Performance/W
i5-1035G1
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
10302 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4