| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs Ryzen 7 6800H


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 6800H is 2.8 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
a40f41
Core
Ice Lake-U
Rembrandt
Architecture
Ice Lake
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
478.73k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
21.04k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
22.41k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
10.21k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
24.27k (x2.94)
TOTAL
55.37k
77.93k (x1.41)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
158.65k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
215.86k (x3.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
89.45k (x3.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
14.77k (x2.67)
TOTAL
171.65k
478.73k (x2.79)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
10638 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4