Core i5-10300H vs Xeon E5-1620 v2
Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-1620 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 92.7 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1620 v2 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 92.7 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1620 v2 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
306e4
Core
Comet Lake-H
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /8
TDP
45 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
10240 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
34.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
144.57k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
12.55k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
12.14k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
4.83k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
4.85k (x0.42)
TOTAL
55.87k
34.37k (x0.62)
Multithread
i5-10300H
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
51.93k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
56.7k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
23.81k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
12.14k (x1.02)
TOTAL
92.66k
144.57k (x1.56)
Performance/W
i5-10300H
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
595 points/W
399 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
974 points/W
436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
226 points/W
183 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
2059 points/W
1112 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3477 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5141 points/GHz
3113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1257 points/GHz
1238 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2540 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
TOTAL
12415 points/GHz
8812 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4