| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs i7-7560U


Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i7-7560U gets 97.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 2.5 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
806e9
Core
Comet Lake-H
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
48.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
97.27k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
12.88k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
20.02k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
4.15k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
8.97k (x0.79)
TOTAL
55.87k
46.02k (x0.82)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
23k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
41.21k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
9.92k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
14.9k (x1.25)
TOTAL
92.66k
89.03k (x0.96)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
19.37k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
17.26k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
3.78k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
7.75k (x0.65)
TOTAL
69.47k
48.16k (x0.69)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
39.17k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
38.24k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
8.9k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
10.97k (x1.37)
TOTAL
246.07k
97.27k (x0.4)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
2611 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
731 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
6485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
5097 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
4543 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
2041 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
12674 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4