| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs i7-4930K


Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-4930K is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 92.7 k points while the i7-4930K gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4930K is 2.1 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
306e4
Core
Comet Lake-H
Ivy Bridge-E
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
32.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
198.27k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
12k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
11.35k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
4.53k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
4.35k (x0.38)
TOTAL
55.87k
32.22k (x0.58)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
72.46k (x2.71)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
80.33k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
33.44k (x3.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
12.03k (x1.01)
TOTAL
92.66k
198.27k (x2.14)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
595 points/W
557 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
974 points/W
618 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
226 points/W
257 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
2059 points/W
1525 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
3477 points/GHz
3077 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5141 points/GHz
2910 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1257 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2540 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
TOTAL
12415 points/GHz
8262 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4