Core i5-10300H vs i7-2640M
Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-2640M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 92.7 k points while the i7-2640M gets 54.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.7 times faster than the i7-2640M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 92.7 k points while the i7-2640M gets 54.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.7 times faster than the i7-2640M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
206a7
Core
Comet Lake-H
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
PGA 988B
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2011
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
25.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
54.86k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i7-2640M
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
9.63k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
8.33k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
4.08k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
3.82k (x0.33)
TOTAL
55.87k
25.86k (x0.46)
Multithread
i5-10300H
i7-2640M
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
21.22k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
19.6k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
10.09k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
3.94k (x0.33)
TOTAL
92.66k
54.86k (x0.59)
Performance/W
i5-10300H
i7-2640M
Test#1 (Integers)
595 points/W
606 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
974 points/W
560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
226 points/W
288 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
2059 points/W
1567 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i7-2640M
Test#1 (Integers)
3477 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5141 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1257 points/GHz
1165 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2540 points/GHz
1092 points/GHz
TOTAL
12415 points/GHz
7390 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4