Core i5-10300H vs i7-10870H
Description
Both models i5-10300H and i7-10870H are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 2 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 2 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
a0652
Core
Comet Lake-H
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
487.05k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
16.14k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
24.74k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
5.98k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
12.7k (x1.11)
TOTAL
55.87k
59.55k (x1.07)
Multithread
i5-10300H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
117.03k (x4.37)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
199.88k (x4.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
50.64k (x4.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
8.23k (x0.69)
TOTAL
92.66k
375.77k (x4.06)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
30.38k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
27.95k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
6.51k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
14.37k (x1.21)
TOTAL
69.47k
79.2k (x1.14)
Multithread
i5-10300H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
216.18k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
210.82k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
51.57k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
8.47k (x1.06)
TOTAL
246.07k
487.05k (x1.98)
Performance/W
i5-10300H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
10823 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4