| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs i5-7300U


Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i5-7300U gets 109.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 2.3 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
806e9
Core
Comet Lake-H
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
48.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
109.1k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
9.85k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
17.37k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
3.98k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
5.11k (x0.45)
TOTAL
55.87k
36.31k (x0.65)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
25.37k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
43.43k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
10.62k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
5.4k (x0.45)
TOTAL
92.66k
84.82k (x0.92)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
20.18k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
18.57k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
4.24k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
5.25k (x0.44)
TOTAL
69.47k
48.25k (x0.69)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
47.75k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
44.82k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
10.82k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
5.7k (x0.71)
TOTAL
246.07k
109.1k (x0.44)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
3184 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
2988 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
380 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
7273 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
5766 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5306 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1213 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
1501 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
13785 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4