| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs i3-6100T


Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-6100T is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i3-6100T gets 105.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 2.3 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
506e3
Core
Comet Lake-H
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
November 2015
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
43.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
105.21k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
10.46k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
17.55k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
3.71k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
3.07k (x0.27)
TOTAL
55.87k
34.79k (x0.62)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
23.92k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
42.11k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
10.51k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
2.57k (x0.22)
TOTAL
92.66k
79.1k (x0.85)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
19.58k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
16.97k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
3.91k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
3.47k (x0.29)
TOTAL
69.47k
43.92k (x0.63)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
47.02k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
44.41k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
9.93k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
3.85k (x0.48)
TOTAL
246.07k
105.21k (x0.43)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
1344 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
1269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
284 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
3006 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
6119 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5303 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
13726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4