| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs i3-6100


Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 2.2 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
506e3
Core
Comet Lake-H
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
45 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
112.28k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
13.78k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
21.21k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
5.2k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
3.73k (x0.33)
TOTAL
55.87k
43.92k (x0.79)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
29.02k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
49.55k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
12.3k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
3.28k (x0.28)
TOTAL
92.66k
94.15k (x1.02)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
22.89k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
21.04k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
4.9k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
4.01k (x0.34)
TOTAL
69.47k
52.84k (x0.76)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
50.05k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
47.13k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
11.38k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
3.72k (x0.46)
TOTAL
246.07k
112.28k (x0.46)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
2202 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4