Core i5-10300H vs i3-4160
Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-4160 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 92.7 k points while the i3-4160 gets 74 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.3 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 92.7 k points while the i3-4160 gets 74 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.3 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-H
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
34.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
74k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
13.02k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
12k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
4.91k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
4.23k (x0.37)
TOTAL
55.87k
34.16k (x0.61)
Multithread
i5-10300H
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
27.45k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
28.96k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
11.83k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
5.77k (x0.48)
TOTAL
92.66k
74k (x0.8)
Performance/W
i5-10300H
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
595 points/W
508 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
974 points/W
536 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
226 points/W
219 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
2059 points/W
1370 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
3477 points/GHz
3616 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5141 points/GHz
3334 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1257 points/GHz
1363 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2540 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
TOTAL
12415 points/GHz
9488 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4