Core i5-10300H vs i3-10110U
Description
Both models i5-10300H and i3-10110U are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 2.3 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 2.3 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
806ec
Core
Comet Lake-H
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
106.58k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
14.25k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
21.55k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
5.16k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
4.26k (x0.37)
TOTAL
55.87k
45.22k (x0.81)
Multithread
i5-10300H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
26.15k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
44.03k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
10.71k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
3.28k (x0.28)
TOTAL
92.66k
84.17k (x0.91)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
24.6k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
22.32k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
5.02k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
4.7k (x0.4)
TOTAL
69.47k
56.64k (x0.82)
Multithread
i5-10300H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
47.98k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
44.28k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
10.33k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
3.98k (x0.5)
TOTAL
246.07k
106.58k (x0.43)
Performance/W
i5-10300H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
7105 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4