Core i5-10300H vs i3-10100T
Description
Both models i5-10300H and i3-10100T are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
227.67k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
13.88k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
20.94k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
5.18k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
8.2k (x0.72)
TOTAL
55.87k
48.19k (x0.86)
Multithread
i5-10300H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
54.88k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
93.17k (x2.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
23.34k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
3.85k (x0.32)
TOTAL
92.66k
175.24k (x1.89)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
24.31k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
22.15k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
5.14k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
8.46k (x0.71)
TOTAL
69.47k
60.06k (x0.86)
Multithread
i5-10300H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
101.48k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
98.04k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
24.28k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
3.86k (x0.48)
TOTAL
246.07k
227.67k (x0.93)
Performance/W
i5-10300H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
3503 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4