| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 2.9 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
806d0
Core
Comet Lake-H
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
709.85k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
17.25k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
25.53k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
12.56k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
11.4k (x1)
TOTAL
55.87k
66.74k (x1.19)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
144.5k (x5.4)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
243.41k (x5.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
109.02k (x10.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
16k (x1.34)
TOTAL
92.66k
512.94k (x5.54)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
30.84k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
26.38k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
12.66k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
11.74k (x0.99)
TOTAL
69.47k
81.62k (x1.17)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
294.86k (x2.79)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
280.92k (x2.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
113.9k (x4.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
20.16k (x2.51)
TOTAL
246.07k
709.85k (x2.88)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4