Core i5-10300H vs Ryzen 9 3900X
Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3900X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 3.1 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 3.1 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-H
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
72.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
756.3k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
16.95k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
25.37k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
9.23k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
24.83k (x2.17)
TOTAL
55.87k
76.38k (x1.37)
Multithread
i5-10300H
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
196.31k (x7.33)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
290.5k (x6.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
143.95k (x14.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
64.92k (x5.45)
TOTAL
92.66k
695.69k (x7.51)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
16.73k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
24.74k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
8.82k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
22.22k (x1.88)
TOTAL
69.47k
72.51k (x1.04)
Multithread
i5-10300H
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
248.24k (x2.35)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
309.66k (x2.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
140.01k (x5.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
58.39k (x7.28)
TOTAL
246.07k
756.3k (x3.07)
Performance/W
i5-10300H
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
2364 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
2949 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
556 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
7203 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5377 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
4831 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
15763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4